I was struck last week at how pervasive the 08 election has become. No matter which party you are affiliated with - or which candidate you are supporting - it is impossible not to appreciate the enormity of 4 November. But I can't recall a time when an election has actually become an experience. On any given day, I receive at least two (if not half a dozen) emails with links to some hybrid of election and pop culture. This morning were references to Dancing with the Stars, the McCain v. Obama Dance Off, and a customizable video encouraging everyone to vote.
There's the constant reference to Tina Fey and Sarah Palin on SNL, Obama is the #1 followed person on Twitter, elaborate Flash sites pop up, and I regularly get links to various articles and podcasts - from NPR to Rollingstone, all pondering the election. Some make fun of the candidates, others dissect the issues.
In any case, this election marks the beginning of a new type of campaign: one based on both impressions and expressions. That is to say, the more activated we are by a piece of media (impression) the more likely we are to send it on, blog about it, or reply to it (expression).
Elections, for any branch of government, rely heavily on word of mouth. This time around, with the proliferation of touch points - and the simplicity of "forward" - word of mouth is an even more powerful and a far-reaching animal. We've reached a type of saturation never known. And for the first time it's measurable.
It will be interesting to see not only what this means for the upcoming election, but also the future of government and community participation.